<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike McCready &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikemccready.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikemccready.com</link>
	<description>giving it my best shot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Is &#8220;Occupy Wall Street&#8221; Really About?</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/10/24/what-is-occupy-wall-street-really-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/10/24/what-is-occupy-wall-street-really-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCready]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protesters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a long time, it has been getting harder to achieve the American dream. While average income for a full-time working male, adjusted for inflation, has remained pretty constant since 1973, the top 1% of US earners has gained ground decade after decade. The objective economic data supporting those facts is solid and has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time, it has been getting harder to achieve the American dream. While average income for a full-time working male, adjusted for inflation, has remained pretty constant since 1973, the top 1% of US earners has gained ground decade after decade.</p>
<p>The objective economic data supporting those facts is solid and has been well documented. The graphic below is based on data provided by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. <strong>My objective is to explain why this is happening and show how to identify the policies that make this happen so we can do something about it</strong> &#8211; ultimately at the ballot box.</p>
<p>To download a pdf file of this position paper, <a href="http://bit.ly/pJ0MOx" target="_hplink">please click here</a>.</p>
<p>(<em>To view a video and subtitles of this text, see the video below. Otherwise, keep reading.</em>)<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GXjTqKyBU2w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>These trends are the result of policies that originate from a &#8220;survival-of-the-fittest&#8221; philosophy and a system that requires individuals to be increasingly exceptional in order to achieve prosperity. Independently of the current economic climate, the rules of the game have become more difficult over time making it not only harder to win but also costlier to not be in the winning 1% of the population. Increasingly, in America fewer people win but winning means winning big. However, if you don&#8217;t win, the consequences are dark. It&#8217;s also harder than ever it&#8217;s to break the cycle of loss and begin with a clean slate. Losing begets more losing in today&#8217;s America.</p>
<p><strong>An economic system rooted in behavioral psychology?</strong><br />
(I know but stick with me).</p>
<p>Psychologists discovered long ago that the most effective way to obtain a desired behavior is to reinforce that behavior with intermittent rewards on a variable schedule. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll explain.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/graph.png"align="left" width="300" height="240">Let&#8217;s say you have a monkey in a cage and you want to teach that monkey to press a button (psychologists actually do this to study learned behavior).  First, you wait for the monkey to press the button by accident or happenstance and then immediately you reward the monkey with some food. Soon, the monkey learns that by purposefully pressing the button he can avoid hunger. Press the button. Get a peanut.</p>
<p>The problem is that as quickly as the monkey learns the behavior he can unlearn it. Stop rewarding the button-pressing and the monkey will cease pressing the button. However, if you start making the reward intermittent (a peanut only after every 3 presses, for example), the monkey will quickly learn that the reward only comes after a certain interval. If at that point you stop rewarding the behavior, it will take little longer for the monkey to unlearn it than in the continuous reinforcement example. But, the behavior still soon goes away.</p>
<p>However, if you really want that learning to stick, you have to change the rewards to a variable ratio. Sometimes you give the peanut after every three button-presses. Sometimes you give it after every five and sometimes you even increase it to ten presses or more before you give up the food. In fact, over time you can increase the interval to over a hundred button-presses. When the monkey can&#8217;t predict how many times he will have to press the button before getting a reward, he will continue to press and it will take a long time to unlearn the behavior. The monkey just keeps working.</p>
<p>Each time you increase the interval, you&#8217;ve made the rules more difficult for the monkey. Each time, he has to work harder to achieve the same result. Yet, the monkey willingly works harder. He learns that his hard work isn&#8217;t consistently rewarded. He learns that if he keeps at it long enough, doing what he&#8217;s learned is supposed to work; eventually he will get his just reward.</p>
<p>These kinds of experiments work with insects, reptiles, rodents, primates and yes, with humans too. This is all well documented in psychology research. You can easily research it yourself.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/HiRes.jpg"align="right" width="200" height="200">America&#8217;s policy makers know this to be true and even if each individual politician is not consciously aware of this, the big political think tanks (e.g. The Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution and scores of others) are keenly tuned into this fact. They know that as long as our rules still make it possible for someone who starts at the bottom to wind up on top, the idea of the American promise is alive.</p>
<p>Going back to our experiment, if you have a limited supply of peanuts and you want the monkey to deliver the maximum number of presses, the smart thing to do would be to find the point of maximum return. You want to optimize the monkey&#8217;s output. What is the least number of peanuts you can give to the monkey without discouraging the monkey to the point the behavior slows down? In other words, how do you keep getting the button pressed and avoid making the monkey so frustrated that he stops pressing the button?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/iStock_000018093760XSmall.jpg"align="left" width="250" height="200">&#8220;Occupy Wall Street&#8221; is not just about Americans who can&#8217;t find work. It&#8217;s about the fact that even when they can find work, the rules have gotten so difficult; the deck has been so stacked against them that there just aren&#8217;t enough rewards in the game to make it seem worthwhile. By trying to optimize the output of our workforce to the breaking point and by keeping too many peanuts for themselves, the 1% has created this situation &#8211; with the help of our politicians they support with their political contributions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about unions. It&#8217;s not about government spending. It&#8217;s not about collective bargaining. It&#8217;s not even about our nation&#8217;s debt. It&#8217;s about the erosion, little by little, of the ability of the working person in this country to control their destiny. It is still possible to be very successful in America. Equality of opportunity is still alive. The problem is that it takes more hard work, more good luck and a greater degree of being exceptionally good at what you do to become wealthy or to even do as well as your parents did just a generation ago.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Screen-Shot-2011-10-24-at-8.45.48-AM.png"align="right" width="250" height="350">There are far too many policies to enumerate that have created this situation to fit into this short position piece. Both parties have contributed to this. But in all fairness, one has and continues to far more then the other. When you take a debate with someone on the right to the underlying philosophy behind their policy proposals; I mean, when you break through the surface issues about them being against Welfare, Medicaid, Medicare, Obamacare, Social Security, higher taxes for the wealthy, diminished workers&#8217; rights etc. It boils down to a basic belief that it&#8217;s about survival of the fittest with a &#8220;winner-take-most&#8221; strategy and that that&#8217;s the best way to create a competitive and prosperous society. They believe in giving workers just enough to keep them producing in what they believe is a completely optimized economy. They want to get the maximum economic return not only from workers but also from our crumbling infrastructure and even from the money that was earned by workers and set aside in corporate pension funds &#8211; which was given to Wall Street to invest, thereby optimizing that money.</p>
<p>Is there anything wrong with believing in maximum optimization?  It&#8217;s really just a fundamental belief they have about where we should take the country. You may agree. That&#8217;s OK. You just have to know fundamentally what you&#8217;re agreeing with. If you are not in the top 1%, you are among those being optimized. And you need to understand that when you vote.</p>
<p>Look, I&#8217;m an entrepreneur. I believe that the one of the roles of business is indeed to get the maximum return on investments. But I also believe that when you extrapolate that to try to run a country as if it were a business and you treat humans as a resource that should be squeezed to extract its maximum output, you disregard inherent but non-measurable values like quality of life, fulfillment and dignity. When you deprive people of those things they actually are less productive, less creative and actually less optimized. Life for the individual becomes more about the pursuit and less about the happiness and when the pursuit isn&#8217;t getting us closer to our hopes and dreams for our children, and ourselves we get frustrated, angry and filled with resentment. <strong>And I just can&#8217;t get on board with that</strong>, despite the fact that I aspire to and work hard toward my own prosperity. And I make no apology for that.</p>
<p>I believe in the American principle of higher advancement to those willing to leverage their natural talents, educate themselves, work hard and create value. But I do not believe in a winner-take-all system where if you&#8217;re not contributing the most, you receive next to nothing.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/iStock_000000182689XSmall.jpg"align="left" width="300" height="200">I believe in a system in which everyone can avoid poverty and even achieve the American dream by simply working hard and being honest. If you want more than that, I think you should work harder, be more and yes, it should be competitive. I do not believe in a system, like the one we have created, where politicians tell you that if you&#8217;re not making ends meet you&#8217;re simply not working hard enough.</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t take more than a hard day&#8217;s honest work to make more than peanuts.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what the &#8220;Occupy Wall Street&#8221; movement means to me.</p>
<p>Please reflect on this. <a href="http://register-vote.com/" target="_hplink">Please vote</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/10/24/what-is-occupy-wall-street-really-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Night at Ground Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/05/02/my-night-at-ground-zero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/05/02/my-night-at-ground-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 08:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ground Zero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama 1 Osama 0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After taking some video (below) I decided to put my iPad to good use and made a little sign using Keynote. The sign was a HUGE hit. My picture must have been taken a thousand times and I'm not exaggerating. Some people who came a bit later mentioned they'd seen me on the news before heading down. Funny.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live about 4 blocks from Ground Zero and when I heard Bin Laden had been killed by US forces, I knew the celebration was something I didn&#8217;t want to miss. I knew a crowd would be forming so I grabbed my iPhone, my iPad and hit the street.  What an experience!!  There were people there of all stripes. Some came to pray. Others came to party, climb the street poles sing, chant and cheer.</p>
<p>After taking some video (below) I decided to put my iPad to good use and made a little sign. The sign was a big hit and my picture must have been taken a thousand times (no exaggeration). Some people who came a bit later mentioned they&#8217;d seen me on the news before heading down.  Funny. </p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Screen-shot-2011-05-03-at-3.51.31-PM.png"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Screen-shot-2011-05-03-at-3.51.31-PM-300x168.png" alt="" title="Mike McCready with iPad" width="300" height="168" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-991" /></a></p>
<p>Below is some of the video I shot. It really transmits what it was like to be in the crowd.</p>
<p><iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vute-SH1GPI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/05/02/my-night-at-ground-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Anyone Else Notice John Boehner&#8217;s Earpiece on Meet The Press?</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/02/13/did-anyone-else-notice-john-boehners-earpiece-on-meet-the-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/02/13/did-anyone-else-notice-john-boehners-earpiece-on-meet-the-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm not saying he was being fed answers from off-camera aids but in this morning's first segment of Meet The Press, Boehner was wearing an ear piece identical to those typically worn by news anchors who use them to take cues and information from the control room regarding breaking news and corrections to any mistakes they might make.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying he was being fed answers from off-camera aids but in this morning&#8217;s first segment of Meet The Press, Boehner was wearing an earpiece identical to those typically worn by news anchors who use them to take cues and information from the control room regarding breaking news and corrections to any mistakes they might make.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Boehner.png"><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Boehner.png" alt="" title="Boehner" width="462" height="526" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-822" /></a></p>
<p>After the first commercial break the ear piece was either gone or moved to the other ear that wasn&#8217;t in the camera angle.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2011/02/13/did-anyone-else-notice-john-boehners-earpiece-on-meet-the-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama at the White House Correspondents Dinner</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/05/02/barack-obama-at-the-white-house-correspondents-dinner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/05/02/barack-obama-at-the-white-house-correspondents-dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 08:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For any of you who might have missed this, Barack Obama killed at last night's White House Correspondents Dinner.  See the video below for laughs and giggles:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any of you who might have missed this, Barack Obama killed at last night&#8217;s White House Correspondents Dinner.  See the video below for laughs and giggles:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/947DWJ3B4K67XLVR" width="488" height="480" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/05/02/barack-obama-at-the-white-house-correspondents-dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am REALLY sick of Glenn Beck taking shots at me!!</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/03/10/i-am-really-sick-of-glenn-beck-taking-shots-at-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/03/10/i-am-really-sick-of-glenn-beck-taking-shots-at-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s about time we sent this guy to the loony bin!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time we sent this guy to the loony bin!</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://cf.cnnbcvideo.com/embed.swf" width="480" height="385" id="viralVideo" style="visibility: visible; "><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="flashvars" value="dataURL=http%3A%2F%2Fbeck.cnnbcvideo.com%2Fembed.xml%3Fbv_id%3Db|38378-Z8Zjm6x&#038;autoPlay=0"><embed src="http://cf.cnnbcvideo.com/embed.swf?dataURL=http%3A%2F%2Fbeck.cnnbcvideo.com%2Fembed.xml%3Fbv_id%3Db|38378-Z8Zjm6x&#038;autoPlay=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/03/10/i-am-really-sick-of-glenn-beck-taking-shots-at-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Number 37 (in the world health care rankings)</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/24/were-number-37-in-the-world-health-care-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/24/were-number-37-in-the-world-health-care-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Number 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Hipp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed it, this is a song about America&#8217;s health care system called We&#8217;re Number 37 by Paul Hipp. The best line is: We&#8217;re #1 in tanks. We&#8217;re #1 in planes. We&#8217;re #1 in war with #2 for brains Check it out:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, this is a song about America&#8217;s health care system called We&#8217;re Number 37 by Paul Hipp.</p>
<p>The best line is:</p>
<p>We&#8217;re #1 in tanks.<br />
We&#8217;re #1 in planes.<br />
We&#8217;re #1 in war<br />
with #2 for brains</p>
<p>Check it out:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yVgOl3cETb4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yVgOl3cETb4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/24/were-number-37-in-the-world-health-care-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joseph Stack&#8217;s Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/18/joseph-stacks-manifesto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/18/joseph-stacks-manifesto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Stack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m seeing on TV that the authorities are taking this manifesto offline. This is the manifesto written by the pilot of the light plane that crashed into the IRS building in Austin, Texas. I have not read it all yet (and don&#8217;t endorse it) but in the interest of free flowing information I&#8217;m posting it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing on TV that the authorities are taking this manifesto offline.  This is the manifesto written by the pilot of the light plane that crashed into the IRS building in Austin, Texas. I have not read it all yet (and don&#8217;t endorse it) but in the interest of free flowing information I&#8217;m posting it here:</p>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
<p><em>If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?”  The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time.  The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken.  Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it.  I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head.  Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.</p>
<p>We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy.  Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all.  We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers.  Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”.  I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood.  These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.</p>
<p>While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind.  Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.</p>
<p>Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours?  Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies.  Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”.  It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.</p>
<p>And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!</p>
<p>How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system?  Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand.  Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand.  The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is.  If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.</p>
<p>How did I get here? </p>
<p>My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s.  Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English.  Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions.  In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy.  We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God).  We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.</p>
<p>The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living.  However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.</p>
<p>That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0.  It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie.  It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.</p>
<p>Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.</p>
<p>On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father.  I realized this at a very young age.</p>
<p>The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.  My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker.  Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement.  Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement.  All she had was social security to live on.</p>
<p>In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time.  When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me).  I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread.  I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made.  I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.</p>
<p>Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer&#8230; and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.</p>
<p>For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).</p>
<p>SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.</p>
<p>(a) IN GENERAL &#8211; Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:</p>
<p>(d) EXCEPTION. &#8211; This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.</p>
<p>(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. &#8211; The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.</p>
<p>Note:</p>
<p>·      &#8220;another person&#8221; is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.</p>
<p>·      &#8220;taxpayer&#8221; is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.</p>
<p>·      &#8220;individual&#8221;, &#8220;employee&#8221;, or &#8220;worker&#8221; is you.</p>
<p>Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated.  The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d).  Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave.  Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.</p>
<p>During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time.  I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity.  This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”.  Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.</p>
<p>After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise.  The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists).  This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.</p>
<p>Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle.  If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.</p>
<p>Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks.  Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s.  Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that.  The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&#038;L fiasco.  However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall.  Again, I lost my retirement.</p>
<p>Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed.  Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare.  Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months.  This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive.  Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY!  After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.</p>
<p>By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change.  Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while.  So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done.  I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work.  The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.</p>
<p>To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA.  This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income.  I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need.  The sleazy government decided that they disagreed.  But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out.  Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.</p>
<p>So now we come to the present.  After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again.  But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle.  After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.</p>
<p>When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order.  I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting.  Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit.  By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.</p>
<p>This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented).  Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone.  The end result is… well, just look around.</p>
<p>I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything.  Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”.  Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.</p>
<p>As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone.  The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government.  Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough).  In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.</p>
<p>I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand.  It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants.  I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after.  But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change.  I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.</p>
<p>I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less.  I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are.  Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer.  The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.</p>
<p>I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different.  I am finally ready to stop this insanity.  Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.</p>
<p>The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.</p>
<p>The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.</p>
<p>Joe Stack (1956-2010)</p>
<p>02/18/2010</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/02/18/joseph-stacks-manifesto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment in Spain Hits 17.4% &#8211; One In Every Six People in New York City Are Hungry</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/01/01/unemployment-in-spain-hits-17-4-one-in-every-six-people-in-new-york-city-are-hungry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/01/01/unemployment-in-spain-hits-17-4-one-in-every-six-people-in-new-york-city-are-hungry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soup Kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no real relationship between these two topics except they&#8217;re both on my mind. I was just reading in today&#8217;s New York Times about Spain&#8217;s growing and worse than expected jobless rate. I spend about a third of my time in Spain and the strange thing is that the bad economy isn&#8217;t nearly as noticeable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no real relationship between these two topics except they&#8217;re both on my mind.</p>
<p>I was just reading in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/business/global/25euecon.html">today&#8217;s New York Times</a> about Spain&#8217;s growing and worse than expected jobless rate. I spend about a third of my time in Spain and the strange thing is that the bad economy isn&#8217;t nearly as noticeable in day to day life as it is where I spend the rest of my time here in New York City.</p>
<p>While real estate prices in Barcelona have really taken a hit and people are losing jobs in the construction and tourism sectors, people seem to be making it work. Of course, as you can read in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/business/global/25euecon.html">this article</a>, the government is getting stretched pretty thin as they try to hold the social net in place. The system may break before recovery can start to pick up the slack. Additionally, being tied to the Euro, Spain does not have the ability to print its own currency like we can in the US to stimulate growth. And the rest of Europe, although struggling, is doing a lot better than Spain is right now. So, Spain&#8217;s economy is likely going to take longer to recover and European policies aren&#8217;t going to cater very much to only one of its member countries. In short, Spain is going to have to sort out much of its own mess.</p>
<p>As you know, in the US we don&#8217;t have the same kind of social net. We rely a lot more on charitable organizations and volunteer-ism to take care of our needy. But that seems a lot less dependable than a government-backed program to insure people don&#8217;t fall through the cracks.</p>
<p>Today, we volunteered in <a href="http://www.holyapostlesnyc.org/haskhome.htm">one of Manhattan&#8217;s largest soup kitchens</a>.  One of the most surprising aspects was how many people who came through looked just like you and me. Sure, there was a fair amount of homeless-looking people. I didn&#8217;t see any families but I did see plenty of people I could pass on the street or see in a subway car and never think they might be needy. I got the impression that there are a lot of people with a white-knuckled fear grip on keeping their lives together.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_364" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/soup-kitchen.jpg"><img src="http://www.mikemccready.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/soup-kitchen-150x150.jpg" alt="Soup Kitchen" title="soup kitchen" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-364" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Soup Kitchen</p></div>We did some digging and found <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/26/080526fa_fact_frazier">an article from The New Yorker </a>on this soup kitchen. If you&#8217;re interested you can read it for yourself but one of the most interesting lines is this one:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Every year, the city has been getting hungrier. The New York City Coalition Against Hunger estimates that 1.3 million New Yorkers can’t afford to buy enough food for themselves and their families all the time. That works out to about one person of every six in the city.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>That is an amazing statistic to me and it generates all sorts of thoughts about volunteer-ism vs. government help. That&#8217;s a topic for another day. For now, <strong>here&#8217;s to 2010 being a year of recovery across the board!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2010/01/01/unemployment-in-spain-hits-17-4-one-in-every-six-people-in-new-york-city-are-hungry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collapse: The End Of The World As We Know It</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/12/28/collapse-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/12/28/collapse-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a documentary that you can probably find on Pay-Per-View Movies or Movies On Demand or whatever your cable company calls them.  It's called "Collapse" and to say it was thought-provoking is an understatement.  If you don't read any further or do anything else, do yourself the favor of watching the trailer video below.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other night I watched a documentary that you can probably find on Pay-Per-View Movies or Movies On Demand or whatever your cable company calls them.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;Collapse&#8221; and to say it was thought-provoking is an understatement.  If you don&#8217;t read any further or do anything else, do yourself the favor of watching the trailer video below.</p>
<p>Michael C. Ruppert makes a very compelling case as to why the world&#8217;s entire economic, social and political structures are on the verge of failure. It&#8217;s hard to poke holes in his arguments. Is he a crackpot? Is he a genius? I walked away with the unsettled feeling that he&#8217;s a man who knows how to connect the dots and is a talented critical thinker.</p>
<p>I can sometimes get a bit obsessive about things and my interests outside of my work can go in spurts so I need to let this documentary / interview settle a little bit before I start making any life decisions based on the learning I did but it has already made me start thinking about my financial positions, exposure and overall preparedness for the future.</p>
<p>That said, in the first part of the interview he lays out his theory of peak oil.  Peak Oil is when we realize that we&#8217;ve gone thruogh about half the available resource and that from this point forward oil production will start to decline.  In fact, he says it&#8217;s already declined 9% and will continue to decline further. He backs that up with several other compelling arguments and then debunks the arguments supporting claims that other possible sources of energy could replace oil.  They all have fatal flaws, according to Michael Ruppert.  So, once he leads the viewer through the horrible thought that the price of oil and its scarcity as a resource will begin to cause economic structures to break down (and soon) he then moves the viewer on to economic policy and politics, finally bringing the solution back home saying, &#8220;It&#8217;s up to you to figure out how you&#8217;re going to survive the transition from the system we&#8217;ve always known and the one we&#8217;re going to have to figure out.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into evrything he says but if you&#8217;ve seen his movie or read one of his books I&#8217;d like to invite you to the comments section below this post to discuss what you think.  This movie is already being acclaimed.</p>
<p>This is from Variety <em>&#8220;Less wake-up call than four-alarm fire, &#8220;Collapse&#8221; forces its audience to witness the testimony of Michael Ruppert, an independent writer and researcher who believes that everything &#8212; industrial civilization, at least &#8212; is falling apart, soon to vanish completely. In other words, it makes countless other political documentaries look like episodes of &#8220;Teletubbies.&#8221;"</em></p>
<p>Patrick Goldstein of the LA Times says, <em>&#8220;Every time I&#8217;d start to think Ruppert was a deluded crackpot, he&#8217;d reel me back in, grabbing me by the throat with a burst of seemingly persuasive analysis. He poses his oil-collapse scenario in simple, hard-to-refute logic. &#8220;Saudi Arabia has 25% of the oil reserves on the planet,&#8221; he explains in a soothing, almost hypnotic voice. &#8220;Why, if Saudi Arabia has all these untapped reserves on shore, are they moving heavily into offshore drilling? If it&#8217;s 5, 10 or 15 times more expensive to drill offshore than land, doesn&#8217;t that tell you that Saudi Arabia knows that they&#8217;ve no more oil to find?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>New York Entertainment says, <em>&#8220;None of the we’re-totally-screwed documentaries we’ve seen over the past few years could&#8217;ve prepare us for the terrors unleashed on our minds in Chris Smith’s riveting new documentary Collapse&#8221;.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in knowing what people who have seen this documentary think k about it and how it changes what they are going to do with their lives.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the trailer:</p>
<p><object width="504" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JNmi49F_DIo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JNmi49F_DIo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="504" height="306"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/12/28/collapse-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spain&#8217;s First Daughters In Combat Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/09/27/spain-first-daughters-in-combat-boots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/09/27/spain-first-daughters-in-combat-boots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCready</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemccready.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Spain you NEVER see pictures of the first family&#8217;s children. José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Spain&#8217;s prime minister doesn&#8217;t allow it. However, this week in New York at the UN Sumit Spain&#8217;s first family had their picture taken with Barack and Michelle Obama and The US State Department posted the photo on Flickr. Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Spain you NEVER see pictures of the first family&#8217;s children. José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Spain&#8217;s prime minister doesn&#8217;t allow it.  However, this week in New York at the UN Sumit Spain&#8217;s first family had their picture taken with Barack and Michelle Obama and The US State Department posted the photo on Flickr. Of course, the photo went viral and now the fist family&#8217;s daughters&#8217; faces have been seen all over the world in spite of the Spanish newspapers blurring out Zapatero&#8217;s daughters&#8217; faces.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not really their faces that are drawing attention at any rate.  It&#8217;s their combat boots!!</p>
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33036398#33036398" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mikemccready.com/2009/09/27/spain-first-daughters-in-combat-boots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

